How to Reach the CoinMarketCap Top 200

Rank 200 is a moving gate, not a fixed market-cap target. A project can appear large enough on paper and still remain outside the CoinMarketCap Top 200 because CoinMarketCap must trust the supply figure, the reference price, the markets behind that price, and the project data around them.

Therefore, founders should treat a Top 200 campaign as an operating-system problem rather than a short marketing push. You need a CoinMarketCap-verified market capitalization, significant liquidity, consistent prices, credible exchange coverage, fresh profile data, and a project that can support real demand. This guide explains those gates, shows what the August 25, 2026 boundary looked like, and gives you a practical dashboard for planning the work.

If your token is not tracked yet, start with the CoinMarketCap listing readiness guide. However, if you already have live markets and a CMC page, the bigger question is whether your data and market structure can withstand verification.

Why a Top 200 CoinMarketCap ranking matters

Greater discovery among investors

CoinMarketCap displays cryptocurrencies according to rank, with positions 101 through 200 appearing on the second page of its main cryptocurrency table. As a result, a Top 200 asset can be easier to discover than one buried among thousands of lower-ranked or unranked projects.

A higher position can increase the number of people who:

• open the project’s CoinMarketCap page;
• add the asset to a watchlist;
• review its markets, tokenomics, holders, unlocks, and price history;
• search for the project on exchanges; and
• compare it with similarly ranked assets.

Still, visibility does not guarantee investment demand. It simply expands the top of the project’s discovery funnel, much like placement across other crypto tracking platforms can widen access to project data.

A stronger data-verification signal

A Top 200 rank requires a CoinMarketCap-verified market capitalization. In other words, CoinMarketCap must be able to verify the project’s circulating supply with sufficient confidence rather than merely displaying a self-reported number.

This matters because opaque token allocations, undisclosed treasury wallets, and unclear unlock schedules create uncertainty. Consequently, a verified circulating supply can make the data easier for users and counterparties to assess.

However, verification is not an endorsement of the project, its team, or its investment potential. CoinMarketCap’s ranking methodology provides general eligibility guidance while preserving internal thresholds and discretion.

Better data distribution

A tracked CoinMarketCap listing receives a CMC rank and appears in the CoinMarketCap Pro API. Therefore, the asset may become available to third-party applications that consume CoinMarketCap data, including portfolio tools, dashboards, analytics products, trading interfaces, media sites, and other market-data integrations.

Top 200 status is not required for every integration. Nevertheless, the work needed to become rankable and supply-verified usually strengthens the project’s data infrastructure across the wider ecosystem.

Clearer exchange, partner, and investor reviews

Exchanges and professional investors rarely make decisions from a CoinMarketCap rank alone. Yet a visible rank, verified supply, multiple active markets, consistent pricing, and transparent unlock data can make a project easier to assess.

In practice, Top 200 status can become one supporting signal during:

• exchange-listing discussions;
• market-maker negotiations;
• ecosystem and wallet integrations;
• strategic partnership reviews;
• institutional research; and
• fundraising and treasury discussions.

The ranking does not replace due diligence. Instead, it can reduce the uncertainty that a counterparty encounters at the beginning of a review.

Potential eligibility for crypto benchmarks

CoinMarketCap data is used in benchmark products. The CMC Crypto 200 Index and CMC Crypto 200 ex BTC Index use CoinMarketCap pricing, supply, and market-cap rankings, with the top 200 universe relevant to constituent selection. These benchmarks are distributed through institutional data platforms, including Nasdaq, Bloomberg, and Reuters.

Moreover, CoinMarketCap operates the CMC100 Index, which includes the top 100 qualifying projects by CoinMarketCap rank while excluding stablecoins and tokens pegged to other cryptoassets. It is market-cap weighted and rebalanced monthly.

A possible progression is Top 200 visibility, then benchmark eligibility, then broader institutional monitoring, and finally possible future product eligibility. However, the sequence is not automatic. Reaching the Top 200 does not guarantee inclusion in every index, exchange-traded fund, fund, or structured product.

Independent benchmark providers also use their own criteria. For example, they may consider qualified exchange support, custody, liquidity, free-floating pricing, market capitalization, and regulatory eligibility. Therefore, a CoinMarketCap rank can help an asset get noticed, but it cannot override a separate methodology.

Furthermore, inclusion in a statistical benchmark does not necessarily create buying demand. Mechanical demand occurs only when an investable product tracks the benchmark, includes the asset, receives capital inflows, and must acquire the relevant tokens during creation or rebalancing. CoinMarketCap itself states that the CMC100 is a benchmark and cannot be directly purchased as an investment product.

Top 200 is not based on market cap alone

The basic formula is straightforward:

CoinMarketCap ranked market cap = CMC reference price x CMC-verified circulating supply

CoinMarketCap ranks assets by circulating market capitalization, not by fully diluted valuation. Therefore, founders must distinguish four different numbers:

• Circulating market cap uses the public float considered to be circulating.
• Total-supply market cap includes all minted tokens other than verified burns.
• Fully diluted valuation generally uses maximum supply.
• Self-reported market cap may be displayed, but it does not affect rank.

CoinMarketCap’s supply methodology explains that self-reported circulating supply can appear alongside the verified figure without ranking implications. As a result, a project cannot solve a rank problem by changing only the number it reports.

A simple market-cap example

Suppose a token has a CMC-verified circulating supply of 500 million tokens and a CMC reference price of $0.20. Its ranked market cap would be:

500,000,000 x $0.20 = $100 million

If its recognized reference price rises to $0.30 while verified circulating supply remains unchanged, the ranked market cap becomes:

500,000,000 x $0.30 = $150 million

Mathematically, the higher price increases market cap and can improve the rank. However, the word recognized is critical.

CoinMarketCap does not necessarily use the last trade on one exchange. Instead, it derives the asset price from market-pair data and applies methods that account for the reliability and distribution of reported prices. The official price methodology also allows non-representative or extreme market inputs to be treated differently.

Consequently, a sudden price spike on one thin or restricted market may have little or no durable effect on the CoinMarketCap reference price.

What market cap is needed for the Top 200?

There is no permanent Top 200 market-cap threshold. Rank is relative, so a project must have a higher eligible market cap than the asset occupying position 200 at that moment.

At the trusted research snapshot on August 25, 2026, Centrifuge occupied CoinMarketCap rank #200 with a market capitalization of approximately $81.01 million and a verified circulating supply of approximately 577.15 million CFG.

However, $81.02 million would not guarantee entry. By the time another project reaches that level, the total crypto market may have changed, a different asset may occupy rank 200, competing projects may have increased in value, or the applicant may still be missing an eligibility factor.

Therefore, monitor the entire rank 180-220 band rather than treating rank 200 as a fixed finish line. Temporary volatility can move a project above or below the boundary even when its operating readiness has not changed.

As an illustrative planning exercise, a 25 percent buffer above the August 25 threshold would be approximately $101 million. That buffer provides no guarantee. Nevertheless, it is a more practical planning reference than attempting to stay exactly one dollar above a moving boundary.

CoinMarketCap rank eligibility at a glance

This planning matrix summarizes the trusted source draft. CoinMarketCap can update methods, apply discretion, and keep internal thresholds confidential.

CoinMarketCap Top 200 eligibility requirements

The matrix shows why a market-cap calculation is necessary but insufficient. According to the trusted source draft, the Top 200 gate also depends on the following factors.

1. Verified circulating supply without inconsistencies

CoinMarketCap must be able to reproduce and verify the circulating-supply calculation. Therefore, it may review initial token distribution, private-sale allocations, team and advisor allocations, foundation wallets, treasury wallets, escrow, locked-token addresses, staking balances, airdrops, future-use allocations, burns, mints, migrations, and redenominations.

CoinMarketCap may calculate circulating supply differently from the project’s whitepaper, API, or internal dashboard. Its team examines blockchain and distribution data to estimate the amount genuinely available in the public market.

Importantly, an unlocked token is not automatically circulating. Tokens held by insiders, the foundation, the treasury, private investors, or other major ecosystem participants may still be excluded when they are not meaningfully part of the public float.

2. Material trading activity across multiple supported exchanges

For an initial tracked listing, CoinMarketCap says an asset should be publicly and actively traded with material volume on at least one exchange that already has tracked status. Consequently, a project must first solve the basic listing and data-delivery problem.

The standard becomes more demanding for verified supply and Top 200 eligibility. The trusted draft notes that CoinMarketCap’s supply methodology gives a general guideline of material trading activity on at least three CMC-supported exchanges with tracked listing status. Current ranking guidance also refers to trading on at least three exchanges with credible operational and data-quality characteristics.

However, CoinMarketCap’s published documentation is not completely uniform on whether all three must be centralized exchanges. One methodology page mentions three non-decentralized exchanges, while newer guidance emphasizes supported, credible exchanges more generally. Therefore, a serious project can use three reputable, CMC-supported centralized exchanges with active spot markets as a conservative operating target while also maintaining healthy decentralized exchange liquidity where relevant.

Merely purchasing three low-quality listings is unlikely to solve the problem. CoinMarketCap evaluates venue quality and may consider reliable APIs, limited data irregularities, active development, professional communication, an engaged community, credible audits, regulatory licensing where applicable, and participation in data initiatives.

If market coverage is your weak gate, compare a practical exchange listing path for tracker visibility with the project’s user, regional, liquidity, and data needs. Additionally, budget for the complete launch rather than the base invoice by reviewing the full cost of centralized exchange listing.

3. Significant liquidity and normal bid-ask spreads

Volume and liquidity are related, but they are not the same. For example, a market can report millions of dollars in volume while still having shallow order books and severe slippage.

CoinMarketCap’s liquidity methodology examines order-book depth and estimates the slippage created by immediate buy and sell orders. The trusted draft notes particular relevance for orders in the approximately $100 to $10,000 range while larger orders are also measured.

Therefore, a project targeting the Top 200 should be able to demonstrate:

• meaningful orders on both sides of the book;
• reasonable spreads;
• sufficient depth near the mid-price;
• limited slippage for normal retail order sizes;
• continuous liquidity throughout the day;
• liquidity across more than one venue; and
• limited dependence on a single market maker or exchange.

4. Consistent pricing across exchanges

Suppose a token trades at $0.20 on two credible exchanges but briefly trades at $0.60 on a thin third venue. In that case, CoinMarketCap may identify the third price as an outlier.

Significant price discrepancies are a direct Top 200 eligibility concern. Moreover, the reference price must be supported by functioning markets where users can realistically deposit, trade, and withdraw the asset.

As a result, price consistency should be monitored as carefully as headline volume.

5. A sufficiently strong CMC Profile Score

CoinMarketCap’s ranking methodology includes a minimum Profile Score for Top 200 consideration, but it does not disclose the precise threshold. This approach provides general guidance without publishing every internal ranking weight or cutoff.

The Profile Score evaluates data completeness and data freshness. In particular, supply information and token-unlock data carry more weight than lower-priority information such as basic social links.

Because the score can decay as information becomes outdated, CoinMarketCap recommends regularly updating supply, unlock schedules, team information, development links, and network metrics. Therefore, do not treat the CoinMarketCap page as a one-time listing form. Treat it as a continuously maintained investor-data profile.

6. Strength across CoinMarketCap’s evaluation framework

CoinMarketCap evaluates projects holistically rather than through a simple pass-fail checklist. Its published framework includes trading volume and market pairs, community interest, traction, team quality, professionalism, product-market fit, practical impact, uniqueness, longevity, and continuing activity.

Moreover, CoinMarketCap benchmarks projects against other applications in the same review cohort. Meeting one numerical threshold therefore does not guarantee Top 200 eligibility.

How to get circulating supply verified

Step 1: Build an address-level supply map

Create one authoritative spreadsheet or database containing every material allocation. For each wallet or smart contract, document:

• blockchain and contract address;
• wallet address and balance;
• allocation category;
• beneficial owner or controlling entity;
• purpose of the allocation;
• vesting or lock conditions;
• unlock date;
• whether tokens are transferable;
• whether tokens have entered the public market;
• evidence supporting the classification; and
• whether the address should be deducted from circulating supply.

Finally, reconcile the sum of all categories with the blockchain’s minted supply minus verified burns. If your contract and allocation records still need a security review, compare smart contract audit providers and methods before presenting the audit as evidence.

Step 2: Separate public float from merely unlocked supply

Do not classify an allocation as circulating simply because its smart-contract lock has expired. Instead, ask:

• Are the tokens still controlled by the team or foundation?
• Were they sold through a public market?
• Are they held by private investors under contractual restrictions?
• Are they earmarked for future ecosystem incentives?
• Can ordinary market participants realistically acquire them?
• Would including them inflate the apparent public float?

CoinMarketCap may exclude allocations that are technically transferable but remain insider-controlled or unavailable to the broader market. Therefore, the operational question is not only whether tokens can move. It is whether they genuinely form part of the public float.

Step 3: Make the calculation reproducible

The ideal supply system updates from transparent on-chain inputs. A practical model is:

Circulating supply = minted supply – burned supply – deductible non-circulating balances

Depending on CoinMarketCap’s classification, deductible balances can include team, foundation, treasury, private-sale, escrow, locked, or future-ecosystem wallets.

Publish the methodology, wallet labels, explorer links, burn transactions, vesting contracts, unlock schedule, and a machine-readable endpoint where possible. In addition, record the date and block height of every reported snapshot.

After verification, CoinMarketCap may update supply in real time by deducting specified wallet balances or using suitable block-explorer APIs when the process is transparent and reproducible.

Step 4: Reconcile every public document

Your website, whitepaper, tokenomics page, block explorer, governance documentation, unlock calendar, exchange announcements, CoinMarketCap submission, self-reporting dashboard, and treasury reports must tell the same story.

Otherwise, contradictions can create delays or prevent verification. Therefore, assign one owner to the canonical supply dataset and require every public surface to use it.

Step 5: Submit the official request

Use the official CoinMarketCap Request Form. For an existing asset, choose the correct request type, such as updating verified supply figures, adding a market or trading pair, updating project information, or processing a token migration.

CoinMarketCap says the online form is the official channel for listing and update requests. Consequently, duplicate submissions, repeated status requests, private outreach to employees, or attempts to bypass the process can delay or damage the application.

The five-gate Top 200 readiness flow

Fix the first failed gate before spending on the next one. A later gate cannot compensate for missing evidence earlier in the flow.

1Supply evidenceReconcile addresses, allocations, burns, locks, bridges, and public float.

2Tracked marketsMaintain credible venues with functioning deposits, withdrawals, APIs, and spot trading.

3Market qualityMeasure spreads, depth, slippage, price dispersion, and venue concentration.

4Profile strengthKeep supply, unlock, team, repository, contract, and network information current.

5Durable bufferMonitor the moving rank band, verified market cap, upcoming unlocks, and ranking stability.

A practical founder roadmap to the Top 200

Phase 1: Establish data integrity

Before focusing on price or marketing, make the project’s supply independently verifiable. The team should complete a full wallet register, a reconciled circulating-supply model, a public tokenomics page, a detailed unlock schedule, labeled treasury and team wallets, reliable explorer coverage, and current contract addresses on every supported chain.

In addition, document burns, mints, bridges, and migrations. Publish security audits and keep project, team, and social information consistent. This foundation becomes difficult to repair after years of undocumented wallet movements, so it belongs early in any structured cryptocurrency launch plan.

Phase 2: Obtain and maintain a tracked listing

Ensure the project has a functional website, a functional block explorer, an actively traded market with material volume, at least one CMC-supported tracked exchange for initial eligibility, a reachable official representative, and accurate contract, website, logo, and social information.

A DEXScan or unverified page is not equivalent to a fully tracked listing. By contrast, a tracked listing receives a CMC rank and can appear in the CMC Pro API.

Phase 3: Expand credible market coverage

Work toward at least three supported, credible trading venues. However, the objective is not to maximize the number of exchange logos. It is to create independent sources of real price discovery.

Prioritize markets with functioning deposits and withdrawals, reliable APIs, visible order books, active users, organic spot volume, reasonable spreads, and professional operations. Moreover, avoid structures designed mainly to inflate activity, such as manipulative trading programs or misleading zero-fee volume.

Phase 4: Improve market quality before chasing price

Measure liquidity directly. Track spread by venue, depth within 0.5 percent, 1 percent, and 2 percent of the mid-price, and estimated slippage for $1,000, $5,000, and $10,000 orders.

Additionally, measure buy-side and sell-side balance, price differences between exchanges, volume concentration, known market-making activity, and periods when deposits or withdrawals are unavailable. The goal is to make the displayed price defensible and executable.

Phase 5: Build genuine token demand

The most sustainable route to a larger market cap is greater demand produced by a functioning project. Depending on the token model, legitimate demand can come from product usage, transaction fees, network security, staking with economic purpose, governance participation, protocol collateral, service access, settlement utility, integrations, developer adoption, or transparent value-accrual mechanisms.

Marketing can accelerate discovery. Nevertheless, it cannot permanently substitute for product-market fit, active users, useful token economics, and broader distribution among real users.

Phase 6: Request verified supply and maintain the profile

Once market infrastructure and documentation are ready, submit the verified-supply request from an official project email. Then provide one structured evidence package and answer follow-up questions precisely.

Afterward, maintain the Self-Reporting Dashboard and keep supply, unlock, team, repository, and network information current. Submit official update requests after material changes, but do not send repeated or conflicting forms.

Phase 7: Maintain a ranking buffer

Crossing rank 200 for several minutes is not the same as establishing a durable position. Therefore, monitor the market cap at ranks 180, 200, and 220, plus the project’s verified market cap and distance from rank 200.

Also track 30-day average rank, days spent in the Top 200, liquidity during volatile periods, upcoming project and competitor unlocks, changes in circulating supply, and exchange concentration. A durable ranking requires both eligibility and a market-cap buffer.

Does increasing the token price move it up the rankings?

Potentially, yes. When verified circulating supply remains constant, a higher CoinMarketCap reference price produces a higher circulating market cap. If the new market cap exceeds those of competing eligible assets, the token can move upward.

However, the increase must be supported by real markets. A price change may fail to produce a durable ranking improvement when it occurs only on one small exchange, the market has shallow liquidity, deposits or withdrawals are suspended, the price diverges from other venues, or the activity appears artificial.

The same limitation applies when the project lacks verified circulating supply, has an insufficient Profile Score, or does not satisfy other Top 200 factors. Therefore, the correct objective is not to make a chart rise for a moment. It is to build enough organic demand and market depth for a higher price to be supported across credible venues.

Can increasing circulating supply improve market cap?

Mathematically, a larger circulating supply at an unchanged price produces a larger circulating market cap. Operationally, however, this is not a reliable ranking strategy.

Additional tokens entering circulation can create dilution and selling pressure. Moreover, CoinMarketCap may reject the classification if the tokens remain insider-controlled, privately allocated, earmarked for future use, or otherwise outside the genuine public float.

Therefore, report circulation because tokens have legitimately entered the public market. Do not release or relabel tokens merely to inflate market cap. The trusted source draft states that manipulation or artificial inflation of supply figures can lead to permanent ranking disqualification.

What founders must not do

A Top 200 strategy should exclude:

• wash trading or self-trading between related accounts;
• circular trading between exchanges;
• fake volume;
• spoofing or layered orders;
• coordinated pump campaigns;
• artificial price support intended to mislead;
• reporting team or treasury tokens as public float;
• concealing private allocations;
• misrepresenting unlock schedules;
• counting wrapped, staked, or bridged representations twice;
• creating fake holder activity;
• submitting contradictory supply figures;
• bribing CoinMarketCap employees; and
• paying unofficial intermediaries who claim to guarantee verification or rank.

CoinMarketCap can exclude suspicious or non-representative markets from its calculations and can delist projects for low liquidity or suspicious trading. Furthermore, attempts to manipulate rankings or bypass the official process can create lasting listing and reputation risk.

Can a project pay CoinMarketCap for a Top 200 rank?

No legitimate payment can purchase a Top 200 position. CoinMarketCap offers paid priority handling for certain listings and non-rank-related updates, but the trusted source draft states that it does not accept payment for rank-related updates such as circulating-supply verification.

Consequently, a paid listing service may reduce processing uncertainty for an eligible page request, but it cannot create verified market cap, genuine liquidity, a compliant Profile Score, or a Top 200 rank.

The founder’s CoinMarketCap Top 200 dashboard

A project serious about this objective should maintain an internal dashboard. Instead of staring at the headline rank, assign every indicator to an owner and review the data on a fixed schedule.

Data and eligibility

• CMC listing status;
• verified circulating supply status;
• verified market cap;
• Profile Score;
• date of the latest critical-data review;
• percentage of supply reconciled to known addresses;
• number of unresolved supply discrepancies;
• next major unlock date; and
• current CMC rank.

Exchange coverage

• number of CMC-supported tracked exchanges;
• number of active spot markets;
• deposit and withdrawal status;
• volume by venue;
• percentage of volume on the largest venue; and
• price dispersion between venues.

Liquidity

• average bid-ask spread;
• order-book depth at 0.5 percent, 1 percent, and 2 percent;
• slippage for $1,000, $5,000, and $10,000 orders;
• percentage of the day with two-sided liquidity; and
• decentralized exchange liquidity-to-market-cap ratio where relevant.

Ranking readiness

• market cap of rank 180;
• market cap of rank 200;
• market cap of rank 220;
• project market-cap distance from rank 200;
• target buffer;
• 7-day and 30-day average rank; and
• days in the Top 200 during the last 30 days.

Fundamental demand

• active users and transactions;
• protocol fees and revenue;
• developer activity and integrations;
• token-holder distribution;
• staking participation;
• token velocity;
• treasury runway; and
• measurable product usage linked to token demand.

Once the dashboard is live, score each area as clear, incomplete, or blocked. Then fix the earliest blocked gate in the readiness flow. If exchange coverage is the blocker, compare venues and listing costs. If supply evidence is the blocker, pause expansion and reconcile the address map first.

Final takeaway: build eligibility before chasing the boundary

Getting a token or coin into CoinMarketCap’s Top 200 is not primarily a submission exercise. It is the result of building a project whose market capitalization, supply data, liquidity, pricing, exchange coverage, and public information can withstand independent verification.

The basic equation remains verified circulating supply multiplied by credible market price equals ranked market capitalization. However, Top 200 eligibility places several gates around that equation.

• CoinMarketCap must verify the circulating supply.
• Self-reported supply does not determine rank.
• The asset needs material activity across multiple supported markets.
• Liquidity and spreads must be credible.
• Prices should be consistent across exchanges.
• The project profile must be complete and current.
• Moreover, the broader project must demonstrate traction, professionalism, activity, and practical value.
• Finally, the resulting market cap must exceed a moving, relative Top 200 threshold.

A higher price can move a token upward, but only when that price is supported by genuine demand and reliable markets. Likewise, a higher reported supply can increase a theoretical market cap, but only CoinMarketCap’s verified public-float figure affects rank.

Therefore, audit the five readiness gates before spending on another listing, campaign, or supply update. If the project’s weak point is credible market access, Tokpie’s relevant listing resources can help you evaluate the next step. If the weak point is data integrity, fix the evidence first.

The best Top 200 strategy is the same strategy that creates a stronger crypto project: transparent tokenomics, measurable adoption, verifiable data, credible markets, deep liquidity, consistent execution, and long-term demand. Top 200 status can amplify those strengths. It cannot sustainably manufacture them.

Frequently asked questions

What market cap guarantees a CoinMarketCap Top 200 rank?

No fixed market cap guarantees the rank. The boundary moves with competing eligible assets, and a project must also satisfy CoinMarketCap’s verification and market-quality factors.

Does self-reported circulating supply affect CoinMarketCap rank?

No. CoinMarketCap can display a self-reported figure, but the trusted source and official methodology state that it has no ranking implications. The verified public-float figure drives ranked market cap.

How many exchanges should a Top 200 project target?

The trusted draft describes at least three CMC-supported tracked exchanges as a general guideline for verified supply and a conservative Top 200 operating target. However, venue credibility, liquidity, APIs, and price consistency matter more than logo count alone.

Can a higher token price improve CoinMarketCap rank?

Yes, if verified circulating supply remains constant and the higher reference price is supported across credible markets. However, a thin, isolated, or artificial price spike may not create a durable ranking change.

Can releasing more circulating supply improve rank?

A larger verified circulating supply can raise market cap mathematically, but releasing or relabeling tokens is not a safe ranking tactic. Tokens must genuinely enter public float, and added supply can create dilution or selling pressure.

Can CMC Priority buy circulating-supply verification or rank?

No. Paid priority can apply to certain listing or non-rank updates, but it cannot purchase verified supply, liquidity, Profile Score, or Top 200 placement.

How should a founder monitor Top 200 readiness?

Track verified supply, unresolved address discrepancies, profile freshness, credible exchange count, deposit and withdrawal status, spread, order-book depth, slippage, price dispersion, verified market cap, the rank 180-220 band, unlocks, and durable product-demand indicators.

This article is for informational and operational planning purposes. It is not investment, legal, market-making, or financial advice. CoinMarketCap can update its methodologies, eligibility rules, and internal thresholds.